A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future (Paperback)
Daniel H. Pink
From Publishers Weekly
With visionary flare, Pink argues that business and everyday life will soon be dominated by right-brain thinkers. He identifies the roots and implications of transitioning from a society dominated by left-brain thinkers into something entirely different - although at times, he seems to be exhorting rather than observing the trend. As a narrator, Pink delivers in a well executed manner, with occasional hints of enthusiasm. He maintains a steady voice that is well suited for a business-oriented text, and his crisp pronunciation and consistent pace keeps listeners engaged and at ease. Updated with new material. A Riverhead paperback (reviewed online). (Feb.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.
The Birth of Modern Science:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_science
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_science
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory
Socrates and the Birth of “The Socratic Method of Scientific Deduction”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underdetermination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_Science
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_knowledge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_scientific_method
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourse_on_the_Method
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_method_topics
http://www.mukto-mona.com/new_site/mukto-mona/Articles/randi/science_pseudoscience.htm
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_equal_causation
http://www.dbskeptic.com/2010/03/14/what-it-means-to-be-scientifically-proven/
http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2010/04/correlation_doesnt_mean_causat.php
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=48
http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2005/12/the_appeal_to_s.html
http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2005/12/the_appeal_to_s.html
http://www.physorg.com/news171800572.html
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory
http://richarddawkins.net/articles/1785
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/features/article782065.ece
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100505215712AAf11ul
http://ask.metafilter.com/148875/Prove-the-scientific-method-works
http://www.northpointeinc.com/pdf/White%20Paper%201%20-%20Evidence-Based%20Practices%20FINAL%201-26-10.pdf
http://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla71/papers/050e-Clyde.pdf
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18524911.600
http://www.proofspace.com/UserFiles/File/ProofDoc_v3.pdf
http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~greg/25/notproof.pdf
http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/01/he-believes-its-true-but-he-cant-prove.html
http://www.philosophypages.com/lg/e15.htm
http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/phy_labs/appendixe/appendixe.html
http://www.anthropoetics.ucla.edu/ap1001/explanation.htm
http://www.romanfrigg.org/Links/MS1/Synthese_MS1_Batterman.pdf
Metaphysics & Philosophical Thought
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_International_Library_of_Psychology,_Philosophy_and_Scientific_Method
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avicennism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sanders_Peirce
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique_of_Pure_Reason
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilles_Deleuze
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_science
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Wilber
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Wilhelm_Friedrich_Hegel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_steiner
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/06/08/1956770.aspx
http://www.gty.org/Blog/B100427
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-newton/science-denial-on-the-ris_b_413848.html
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/quotes.html
http://zapatopi.net/kelvin/quotes.html
Modern Theoretical Quantum Physics-Thought
http://library.thinkquest.org/3487/qp.html
http://www.fisica.net/quantica/Phillips%20-%20Introduction%20to%20Quantum%20Mechanics.pdf
http://www.higgo.com/quantum/laymans.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_physics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Everett_III
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niels_Bohr
http://www.fredalanwolf.com/
http://www.whatthebleep.com/
http://mkaku.org/
http://www.greggbraden.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_philosophy_articles_(I%E2%80%93Q)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mysticism
http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Zeno-Paradoxes,-Metaphysics-and-Modern-Quantum-Mechanics&id=4225648
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-Quantum-Theory-Mechanics.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_field_theory
http://www.dmoz.org/Science/Physics/Alternative/Unified_Theories/
Pragmatism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatism
Mind and Matter
http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/
http://www.amazon.com/Whole-New-Mind-Information-Conceptual/dp/1573223085
http://www.amazon.com/Field-Quest-Secret-Force-Universe/dp/0060931175
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/mm/2005/00000003/00000002/art00002
http://www.informaworld.com/index/793914467.pdf
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301008207000123
http://www.julieboyd.com.au/ILF/pages/members/cats/bkovervus/ecolearning_pdfs/synchronicity.pdf
http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v6/n7/abs/nrn1705.html
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=L0iTWd_vX7UC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=mind+affect+matter&ots=wmeNemQFMB&sig=NtQkDj-iLp4IXnQ1UXyZfId3P2Y
Energetic Physics
http://www.esalenctr.org/display/bios.cfm
Ref. Healing
http://www2.chem.ucsb.edu/coursepages/archive/fall03/94-Reich/Laird2.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Cayce
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Lipton
http://www.matrixenergetics.com/
http://www.candacepert.com/
http://www.energetic-medicine.net/research.html
http://www.energy-medicine.info/energetic-medicine.html
http://www.energymedicinereview.com/
http://www.thelivingmatrixmovie.com/
http://www.amazon.com/True-Power-Water-Discovering-Ourselves/dp/0743289811
http://blogs.nature.com/scurry/2010/04/17/homeopathy-and-the-structure-of-memory
http://www.science-parliament.eu/forums/2010-water-science-society/995/water-has-a-memory
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=11705
http://www.life-enthusiast.com/twilight/research_water_memory.htm
http://www.aqualiv.net/component/content/article/51-the-aqualiv-story
http://www.waterria.com/water.html
http://www.teslatech.info/ttmagazine/v3n4/suddath.htm
http://www.teslatech.info/ttmagazine/v3n4/suddath.htm
http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/spinfield-effects.htm
http://www.h2omwater.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=113&Itemid=110
http://lewfh.tripod.com/
http://www.sacredsites.com/europe/france/lourdes.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lourdes
http://www.healyourlife.com/author-doreen-virtue/2010/01/wisdom/inspiration/waters-that-heal
http://www.energeticpendants.com/
http://intentional-healing.org/consultation-the-healing-process-remote-healing/ses-water-health-water/
http://healing-water.org/
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3411/02.html
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1951968,00.html
http://www.positivehealth.com/article-list.php?subjectid=95
http://www.amazon.com/Neo-Naturopathy-Science-Doctrine-Diseases/dp/0766178803
http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020160.khune/kuhne.pdf
CONCLUSION:
We demonstrate a "repeatable phenomenon” of:
When we apply water treated with our technology, to the face, (or any skin), with the intention of making the skin healthier and younger looking… it is quickly observed#1 by most#2 individuals, that the part of the skin#3 which has been treated, is noticeably younger and/or healthier looking. This is especially noticeable, the longer the subject uses our product… and even more so, with photo documentation.
We offer a “Hypothesis”.
From dictionary.com
Hy·poth·e·sis
1. a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.
2.a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument.
3.the antecedent of a conditional proposition.
4.a mere assumption or guess.
SIMILAR EXAMPLE:
Similar to gravity… we all can observe its repeatable properties, and Sir Isaac Newton wrote the physical laws describing them… But it has never been sufficiently scientifically described as to WHY, or HOW it works.
It is a repeatable observed phenomenon, with no clear scientific explanation, for its cause.
We offer this hypothesis:
We have “Programmed” an “Energetic Message” in our water, for the skin to grow more healthy and “younger”, but (by today’s measurements) there is no scientific explanation, as to why this actually occurs.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
#1. for the most part, virtually repeatable… 98% of the time
#2. 95%, including the subject
#3. half of their face
There is a new term being use with some pharmaceuticals, and Nutraceuticals...
It is called: “Evidence Based Examples”: It means that the time and expense to exactly chemically, scientifically prove how these substances directly work on the physiological mechanism, of thee body, has not been done.
However, there is abundant, historical, documentable “evidence” that the intended use of these products, cause the desired effect, repeatedly!